<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stuff &#38; Nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com</link>
	<description>dave and todd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:31:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>LOST: Goodbyes</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/05/lost-goodbyes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/05/lost-goodbyes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As there&#8217;s no way to talk about this episode without spoilers, the whole post is behind the fold.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Months ago, the press coverage of the final season trumpeted a bloodbath episode in the approach to the season finale.  Hard to imagine this wasn&#8217;t it.  It&#8217;s not that LOST has no history of wiping out regulars (Boone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As there&#8217;s no way to talk about this episode without spoilers, the whole post is behind the fold.</p>
<p><span id="more-296"></span></p>
<p>Months ago, the press coverage of the final season trumpeted a bloodbath episode in the approach to the season finale.  Hard to imagine this wasn&#8217;t it.  It&#8217;s not that LOST has no history of wiping out regulars (Boone and his sister, Eko, Libby and Ana Lucia, Michael, Charlie, Locke), but it&#8217;s never done so in bulk like this.  Three of the original survivors from episode 1 were killed in a space of 2-3 minutes, plus (maybe) Lapidus.</p>
<p>But for the most part, I found their deaths somewhat unaffecting, and in the hours since watching, I&#8217;ve been asking myself why.  I think the answer can be found in Quentin Tarentino&#8217;s brilliant film <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/"><em>Pulp Fiction</em></a> (no, really).  And if you&#8217;re the last living person who has yet to see <em>Pulp Fiction</em>, you should definitely stop reading now.</p>
<p>If you know me at all, you know that I think <em>Pulp Fiction</em> is one of the great movies of all time, and arguably the best of the last quarter century.  Possibly the most cunning aspect of <em>Pulp Fiction</em> is the sequencing of the tales.  If the film were told in time sequence, it would open with the visit by Vincent and Jules to the wannabe drug dealer, followed by the accidental Marvin shooting and the cleanup by the Wolf.  Then Butch would meet Marcellus about throwing the fight (and have his first unfortunate interaction with Vincent), and Vincent and Jules would go to the diner where they&#8217;d meet Honey Bunny and husband and Jules would decide to be the shepherd.  Later that day, Butch would throw the fight and Vincent would have his dinner with Mia.  Overnight, Butch and Marcellus would have the incident with Zed, and Vincent would bring the overdosing Mia to his heroin dealer for the memorable adrenalin shot.  Finally, early the next day, Butch would return home for the Christoper Walken watch and shoot Vincent, before leaving on Zed&#8217;s motorcycle with his girl.</p>
<p>Sure, the movie could have been told that way.  But the Vincent/Mia &#8220;date&#8221; would not fit well with the creepy basement &#8220;Bring in the gimp!&#8221; scene.  Jules&#8217; defining moment would happen much too soon.  And most importantly, Vincent&#8217;s sudden demise would be immensely unsatisfying.  Vincent would have appeared in nearly every scene until Butch&#8217;s appearance on the second day, and then would die on the john right before the end, without a word of dialogue.</p>
<p>Instead, Tarantino saves the diner scene for the end, and miraculously, we get more time with Vincent.  We enter the scene knowing that Vincent&#8217;s end is imminent, but not knowing when it will occur, or more importantly, why Jules is not with him.  Jules&#8217; decision to leave the service of Marcellus is doubly meaningful, because we know that Vincent will be alone at Butch&#8217;s apartment when he&#8217;s shot.  Thus, his hopeful and life-altering change proves bittersweet, because we already know how it will turn out for Vincent.</p>
<p>So &#8211; back to LOST.  Last night, we lost three or four key characters in the space of a few tense underwater seconds.  Sayid bolted away from the camera with the bomb to be annihilated offscreen.  Jin and Sun had a powerful <a href="http://">Jack and Rose</a> <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tx_OOq5fu-8/ShfHMbrGJmI/AAAAAAAAGEM/YtHyR5PjE6s/s320/POST.jpg">moment</a> as the submarine sank.  I guess Lapidus got mashed by a door &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t all that clear.</p>
<p>But, as in <em>Pulp Fiction</em>, we&#8217;ll see these characters again, as we have every major character who has died on or off the island (with the exception of Eko, who has permanently disappeared due apparently to his unwillingness to sign on for any new episodes).  In fact, given that Sayid, Sun, and Jin play central roles in the flash-sideways sequence that is ongoing, we&#8217;ll probably see them next week.  Thus, their deaths, while sad, seem temporary.  No less noble &#8212; Sayid sacrificing himself to save the others, Jin refusing to leave his trapped wife to drown &#8212; but more ephemeral.</p>
<p>Of course, as in real life, the loss that surviving mourners feel is often more affecting, more tragic, than the deaths themselves.  And watching Hurley, Kate, and Jack sob at the loss of their friends was every bit as heart-wrenching as it should have been.  Lest there be any doubt, these recent episodes show brilliant storytellers at the absolute peak of their abilities.  The end of this six-season journey looks like it&#8217;s going to be every bit as good as we could have hoped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/05/lost-goodbyes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catching Up To Do</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/catching-up-to-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/catching-up-to-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen last night&#8217;s AI or Lost yet, because I was doing this instead:</p>
<p></p>
<p>Updates on TV stuff later (or tomorrow).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen last night&#8217;s AI or Lost yet, because I was doing this instead:</p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nIFzU3O-oyY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nIFzU3O-oyY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>Updates on TV stuff later (or tomorrow).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/catching-up-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Double Down or Not&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/to-double-down-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/to-double-down-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>FiveThirtyEight is one of my favorite blogs, even when it&#8217;s not presidential election season.  But Nate Silver has turned his analytical skills to a new subject today:  the KFC Double Down.  Awesomeness here.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FiveThirtyEight is one of my favorite blogs, even when it&#8217;s not presidential election season.  But Nate Silver has turned his analytical skills to a new subject today:  the KFC Double Down.  Awesomeness <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/double-down-by-numbers-unhealthiest.html">here</a>.<img class="alignright" title="Copyright KFC 2010" src="http://www.kfc.com/doubledown/images/doubledown.jpg" alt="" width="562" height="319" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/to-double-down-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: The Man from Beijing</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/book-review-the-man-from-beijing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/book-review-the-man-from-beijing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Henning Mankell is a prolific Swedish mystery writer, whose police procedurals featuring Inspector Kurt Wallender have reached bestselling status in a number of countries and spawned a BBC miniseries.  His latest novel to reach U.S. shores (translated from the original Swedish), titled The Man from Beijing, interweaves a traditional whodunit with seemingly autobiographical details of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henning Mankell is a prolific Swedish mystery writer, whose police procedurals featuring Inspector Kurt Wallender have reached bestselling status in a number of countries and spawned a BBC miniseries.  His latest novel to reach U.S. shores (translated from the original Swedish), titled <em>The Man from Beijing</em>, interweaves a traditional whodunit with seemingly autobiographical details of his former Maoist political activism, and has received some of the best critical acclaim of Mankell&#8217;s career.  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307271862?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=stunon02-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0307271862"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-279" title="beijing" src="http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/beijing.jpg" alt="" width="108" height="160" /></a></p>
<p>The book begins with a mass murder in a tiny and remote Swedish village and the police investigation that immediately follows.  A federal judge, Birgitta Roslin, learns that some distant relatives were among the victims and begins her own parallel investigation.  Mankell weaves in diaries of an ancestor of Roslin&#8217;s who worked building railroad lines through the American West, as well as the story of Chinese immigrants who were subject to brutal conditions in providing labor for the same endeavor.  We learn that Roslin was a Maoist in her youth, and her sojourn to present-day China frames the country&#8217;s attempts to keep up with the stratifying effects of capitalism and leads to a key sequence in Mozambique, where Mankell lives today.</p>
<p><span id="more-274"></span>This sequence of locales and storylines implies a breakneck pace and clever interlocking of seemingly disparate threads, but unfortunately the book provides neither.  The early focus on the police investigation is largely dropped, and Roslin meanders listlessly through her portions of the story while events unfold around her, often without directly involving her.  Rather than forming a seamless whole, the sections of the book function almost independently, often killing narrative momentum.</p>
<p>Mankell&#8217;s novel treads the ground of espionage master John le Carré&#8217;s novels often use traditional cloak and dagger tropes to immerse the reader in exotic, non-Anglocentric scenarios.  His characters blend seamlessly into backdrops like British-rule Hong Kong (The Honourable Schoolboy), Nairobi (The Constant Gardener), East Germany just after the construction of the Berlin Wall (The Spy Who Came in from the Cold), and Panama following the ouster of General Noriega (The Tailor of Panama).  The novels are often polemics, illustrating a particular controversy or event from a new persepctive.</p>
<p>While Mankell&#8217;s novel zigzags in location and time, from rural Sweden to 19th Century China, to America during the Gold Rush, to modern-day Beijing, the writing never fully evokes the setting.  Mankell packs the Chinese sections with his research on the failure of the benefits of modern industry to trickle down to the billions of Chinese peasants, but all of that research appears to do nothing more than set the stage for an anti-climactic confrontation between supporting characters that oddly does not take place in China at all.  While the judge travels around Sweden and China (and contemplates whether there is a future for her marriage), the investigation of the murders is given short shrift, particularly given that the novel opens focused entirely on the investigation.  And although a significant part of her youth was spent carrying Mao&#8217;s red book and dreaming of a role in the eventual peasant revolution, she appears strangely unmoved during her time in China.</p>
<p>Ultimately, Mankell&#8217;s reach exceeds his execution.  Some of the portions of the book work as set pieces, particularly the simple story of three Chinese brothers making the journey from an oppressively poor village across the ocean to America.  But the novel as a whole bursts the seams, with its many disparate elements failing to conceal the inadequacies of the plot.  Where le Carré&#8217;s novels are immersive, Mankell&#8217;s only skims the surface, bravely trying on many levels but failing to succeed on most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/book-review-the-man-from-beijing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idol Thoughts: Why The Judges&#8217; Save Doesn&#8217;t Really Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-why-the-judges-save-doesnt-really-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-why-the-judges-save-doesnt-really-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some people get a little foamy at the mouth at the prospect of the judges&#8217; save.  Last night, Big Mike Lynche got the lowest number of votes, but was saved by the judges, setting up a double-elimination next week.  In previous seasons, many argued that the save was unfair, that the network was putting its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people get a little foamy at the mouth at the prospect of the judges&#8217; save.  Last night, Big Mike Lynche got the lowest number of votes, but was saved by the judges, setting up a double-elimination next week.  In previous seasons, many argued that the save was unfair, that the network was putting its thumb on the scale.  But ultimately, the save is meaningless.  Here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>Do you know how many times an eventual winner has finished in the bottom two at this stage of the competition?  None.  <em>It&#8217;s never happened.</em> In fact, no winner has ever finished in the bottom two before the Top 7 week.  Winners don&#8217;t build over the course of the season &#8212; Idol rewards frontrunners, and the eventual winners are popular from the start.  They don&#8217;t tell you who has the highest number of votes each week, but they don&#8217;t need to &#8212; just look for the people who are never in the bottom.  Those are the only people with a chance to win.</p>
<p>Think I&#8217;m exaggerating?  How about this fact:  Fantasia Barrino was the only winner ever to be in the bottom two <em>at any point before the finals</em>.  In seven of the eight seasons of the show, the eventual winner was never in danger of leaving, and Fantasia&#8217;s Top 7 hiccup occurred when she and America were cruelly subjected to Barry Manilow week.</p>
<p>So Big Mike may stay around for another week, or even another four or five, but he&#8217;s not going to win.  Tim, who&#8217;s been on the brink of elimination twice, can expect an early exit.  Andrew, buddy?  You&#8217;re done too.  Watch the bottom two in the coming weeks, because the single most significant key to determining the final winner is who doesn&#8217;t get a whiff of failure.  In fact, only two <em>runners-up</em> ever finished in the bottom two before the Top 7 (Katharine McPhee and Bo Bice), and each of them only once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-why-the-judges-save-doesnt-really-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idol Thoughts: Not That Bad</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-not-that-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-not-that-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a surprise, the Top 9 put together the best set of performances of the season, climbing from the depths to, at the very least, mediocrity.</p>
<p>Last year&#8217;s Beatles nights (yup, two consecutive weeks last season &#8211; who thought that was a good idea?) were debacles, as the contestants made poor song choices and looked terribly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a surprise, the Top 9 put together the best set of performances of the season, climbing from the depths to, at the very least, mediocrity.</p>
<p><span id="more-268"></span>Last year&#8217;s Beatles nights (yup, two consecutive weeks last season &#8211; who thought that was a good idea?) were debacles, as the contestants made poor song choices and looked terribly uncomfortable through most of the performances.  This year, most of the song choices were at least defensible, and eight of the nine performances were at least decent.</p>
<p>Who was the ninth you ask?  Sad to say, Lee DeWyze.  He&#8217;s been a critical darling all year, though I&#8217;ve never been a fan.  Over the past couple of weeks, I started to warm to him, but his performance of &#8220;Hey Jude&#8221; was just unequivocally bad.  Off key the entire song, Lee actually turned away from the microphone at one point in the middle of singing to make sure he was playing the right chord.  Really?  There&#8217;s like two chords in that song.  Then the guy with the bagpipes came marching down the stairs.  Disaster with a capital &#8220;Duh.&#8221;  Note to Idol contestants: sing alongs with the crowd in a 90-second performance will never work.</p>
<p>I thought three performances clearly outshone the others.  Crystal, on a night where she struggled with her voice, had her most likeable performance.  I still don&#8217;t think I can be classified as a fan, but her slinky version of &#8220;Come Together&#8221; (and no, I never thought I would use the word &#8220;slinky&#8221; in describing her this season either) had a great groove and was massively entertaining.  The didgeridoo I just don&#8217;t get, but whatever.  Note to Ricky Minor:  if you can&#8217;t find someone with more than three days experience to play an instrument, probably best not to put him on stage next to the singer.</p>
<p>Siobhan was brilliant last night, and Kara&#8217;s comments had me scratching my head.  Let&#8217;s recap:  last week, all the judges tell Siobhan she needs to dial it back, not scream, and sing really well.  She sings a quiet, contemplative version of &#8220;Across the Universe&#8221; and sings it <em>perfectly</em>, with control and emotion.  Then Kara says she doesn&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221; because Siobhan didn&#8217;t scream.  Como say what?  Note to the judges:  Sometime today, you are going to go back and listen to Siobhan&#8217;s performance again and the light bulb will come on.  You don&#8217;t always have to show off to sing great &#8212; it&#8217;s often harder to sound terrific when doing something more understated.  There is not another singer in this competition who could have succeeded the way Siobhan did last night.  Not one.</p>
<p>But the best performance of the night, and maybe the season, was Casey&#8217;s version of John Lennon&#8217;s &#8220;Jealous Guy.&#8221;  I got a sense that someone was going to sing a solo Lennon or McCartney song when the opening sequence described the solo success of each post-Beatles.  Then I forgot about it until Casey chose this criminally underrated Lennon tune.  This performance had it all:  terrific guitar playing, big vocal range, a performer in total control.  And look, no bagpipes or didgeridoo.  Note to the frontrunners:  Casey is the overlooked contender; he may not be the best every week (although he was this week), but he&#8217;s never among the worst.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been pretty obvious for weeks that there is a clear top 5, and that the others have their work cut out for them if they want to crash the party.  Crystal, Siobhan, Lee, Casey, and Big Mike are going to be battling four weeks from now unless something shocking happens.  Aaron and Katie are fine karaoke singers, but completely uninteresting.  Andrew is interesting but not all that good.  Tim is Sanjaya.</p>
<p>In closing, I have to give a shout out to Aaron who chose &#8220;The Long and Winding Road,&#8221; just as <a href="http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-what-to-do-on-lennonmccartney-night/">I suggested yesterday</a> he should.  What&#8217;s that you say?  He wasn&#8217;t very good?  Well, that&#8217;s on him &#8212; he should have sung it better.</p>
<p>Predictions for tonight&#8217;s bottom three:  Andrew, Aaron, Tim</p>
<p>Going home:  Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-not-that-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idol Thoughts: What to Do on Lennon/McCartney Night?</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-what-to-do-on-lennonmccartney-night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-what-to-do-on-lennonmccartney-night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The contestants have an embarrassment of riches to choose from tonight, and will undoubtedly screw it up just like they did last year.  But if I were coaching the final nine, these are the songs I would pick:</p>
<p>Crystal – In My Life</p>
<p>Casey – Revolution 1</p>
<p>Siobhan – Got to Get You Into My Life</p>
<p>Lee – Drive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The contestants have an embarrassment of riches to choose from tonight, and will undoubtedly screw it up just like they did last year.  But if I were coaching the final nine, these are the songs I would pick:</p>
<p>Crystal – In My Life</p>
<p>Casey – Revolution 1</p>
<p>Siobhan – Got to Get You Into My Life</p>
<p>Lee – Drive My Car</p>
<p>Andrew – Here, There and Everywhere</p>
<p>Big Mike – Golden Slumbers</p>
<p>Aaron – The Long and Winding Road</p>
<p>Katie – Yesterday</p>
<p>Tim – Fool On The Hill</p>
<p>My guess is that none of these will actually be chosen by the person I&#8217;ve indicated.  Nevertheless, let&#8217;s hope someone, anyone, is good tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/04/idol-thoughts-what-to-do-on-lennonmccartney-night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOST: Me and the Devil</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/03/lost-me-and-the-devil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/03/lost-me-and-the-devil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night featured the long-awaited Richard Alpert backstory.  Spoiler-y goodness behind the fold:</p>
<p>Who knew Richard Alpert was such a romantic?  Maybe we should have guessed with those eyelashes.  Turns out Richard&#8217;s story is a 140 year tale of love and loss, suddenly vaulting him to #1 on the &#8220;Tragic Island Denizen&#8221; list.</p>
<p>I want to focus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night featured the long-awaited Richard Alpert backstory.  Spoiler-y goodness behind the fold:</p>
<p><span id="more-262"></span>Who knew Richard Alpert was such a romantic?  Maybe we should have guessed with those eyelashes.  Turns out Richard&#8217;s story is a 140 year tale of love and loss, suddenly vaulting him to #1 on the &#8220;Tragic Island Denizen&#8221; list.</p>
<p>I want to focus on one specific thing from last night&#8217;s episode though, the first conversation between Richard and Jacob.  Jacob wants Richard to be his right-hand man, and asks Richard what he wants.  Richard asks to be with his wife or to be saved from hell, and Jacob replies to both requests that he &#8220;can&#8217;t do that.&#8221;  Finally, Richard says he wants to live forever so he won&#8217;t go to hell, to which Jacob replies, &#8220;That I can do.&#8221;</p>
<p>So who is Jacob really?  Is he god/God?  I think that, despite his claimed limitations, he might well be.  He says that he doesn&#8217;t act directly so that the people he brings to the island must exercise free will.  This could explain why he &#8220;can&#8217;t&#8221; reunite Richard with his wife &#8212; she&#8217;s dead and he&#8217;s alive, and Jacob is not going to kill Richard.  As for being saved from hell, I think there&#8217;s another interpretation:  Jacob literally can&#8217;t save Richard from hell, because he&#8217;s not going there anyway.  Jacob&#8217;s bargain with Richard and his refusal to &#8220;save&#8221; him may simply be Jacob&#8217;s way of allowing Richard to live long enough to realize that he&#8217;s a good man.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Jacob could just be a proxy for god, a servant of good.  There are definite Jesus parallels: his sacrifice in allowing himself to be killed by Ben Linus (John 3:16 &#8212; &#8220;For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him  should not perish, but have everlasting life.&#8221;); his placement on the island as the &#8220;cork&#8221; in the wine bottle holding in evil.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a recurring theme for the writers this year to make reference to the theories of Lost fans.  Last night&#8217;s episode was no exception, digging out the biggest early theory of all, that the survivors are actually dead and living in hell or purgatory.  Hearing Richard say it out loud was a reminder of all of the promise that this show had back in Season 1 (and also a reminder that Cuse and Lindelof swore in interviews that the characters were NOT dead).  We weren&#8217;t intended to believe Richard, but instead were invited, as we have been so many times this final season, to remember seasons past.</p>
<p>I thought this was a brilliant episode, topping even the massively entertaining Sawyer ep from last week.  Also, that it was incredibly brave to conduct more than half of one of the show&#8217;s most important episodes in Spanish with subtitles.  Lost keeps raising the bar, and I&#8217;m growing more and more optimistic that the ending will be satisfying.</p>
<p>What did you think of last night&#8217;s episode?  Like the spiritual component?  Or do you think Lost is disappearing down the same hole as Battlestar Galactica?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/03/lost-me-and-the-devil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idol Thoughts: Wow.  Just&#8230; wow.</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/03/idol-thoughts-wow-just-wow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/03/idol-thoughts-wow-just-wow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s Idol featured one of those moments, one of those unforgettable performances that live in Idol history.  Sadly for Paige Miles, it was because the performance was so breathtakingly bad, so spectacularly dreadful, that it will be the limbo stick under which Idol contestants fail to crawl for years to come.</p>
<p></p>
<p>A sign of what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s Idol featured one of those moments, one of those unforgettable performances that live in Idol history.  Sadly for Paige Miles, it was because the performance was so breathtakingly bad, so spectacularly dreadful, that it will be the limbo stick under which Idol contestants fail to crawl for years to come.</p>
<p><span id="more-259"></span></p>
<p>A sign of what was to come was offered by Ryan, who suggested that &#8220;some Phil Collins&#8221; was due after the break.  I turned to my wife and said, &#8220;Please don&#8217;t let it be Against All Odds again.&#8221;  Naturally, it was, but still, we had no idea of the horrors to come.  I struggled for a comparison, and here&#8217;s the best I could come up with.  When our cat was young, he hated the travel cage.  My wife used to grab him in a pillow case and carry him to the vet in a cab so that she wouldn&#8217;t have to put him in the cage.  Whenever she&#8217;d grab him with that pillow case, he&#8217;d make this terrible and sad howling noise that caused people for miles around to gnash their teeth and weep.  This was like that, only worse.</p>
<p>The judges (somewhat surprisingly considering their relative inability this season to unanimously recognize bad singing) pounced quickly, with even Ellen getting in on the fun, falling back on the Paula special, &#8220;You look beautiful.&#8221;  The kiss of death indeed.  The most amusing thing about the performance is that it seemed to suck all of the tension out of the rest of the night.  All of the contestants seemed to know that they could suck &#8212; a lot &#8212; and would still be fine as long as they didn&#8217;t drop F-bombs on stage or swallow their tongue.</p>
<p>And suck they did.  This was what I expected last week when the contestants were required to choose Stones tunes.  This week, with 100 years of #1 hits to choose from, they produced a string of lousy performances of songs we&#8217;ve heard over and over again in previous seasons.</p>
<p>First, the good from a decidedly bad lot.  Siobhan trotted out Stevie Wonder again, following up her Hollywood week performance of &#8220;Living For the City&#8221; with &#8220;Superstitious.&#8221;  Simon&#8217;s right &#8211; she needs to bag the hollering for a couple weeks, but otherwise this performance was so much better than the others that it was like seeing Joss Stone at her high school talent show.  In a shocker, Crystal played Janis Joplin!  No, really!  Her performance of &#8220;Me and Bobby McGee&#8221; was just fine (and my wife, who digs the hippy tunes, loved it), but I&#8217;m just so bored with her.  She needs to do something different.  But man, she was rocking the new teeth.</p>
<p>Big Mike was also just fine with a safe rendition of Percy Sledge&#8217;s &#8220;When a Man Loves a Woman.&#8221;  Nothing exciting here, and a 60&#8217;s Motown number was what I would have predicted he&#8217;d go to, but as with Crystal, he can coast for right now.  Lee was done no favors by getting the first slot in front of &#8220;The Disaster That Was Paige,&#8221; but was also okay with his performance of &#8220;The Letter.&#8221;  I&#8217;m guessing this was his tribute to Alex Chilton, who died last week and performed that song with the Box Tops, but if it was, I think he should have said so.  The performance was notable because &#8212; well, no, it wasn&#8217;t really notable at all.  But it wasn&#8217;t bad, and on this night, that was good.  Casey was fine tonight too, doing a bar singer rendition of &#8220;The Power of Love&#8221; (Huey Lewis, not Peter Cetera).  Casey seems to dig him some 80s cheese-pop:  he also sang Bryan Adams earlier this year.  I like it anyway, though, because he seems like the least ironic guy in the world.  He can pull off these tunes because he&#8217;s not a navel-gazing whiner listening to Conor Oberst tunes on loop on his iPod.</p>
<p>The best that can be said for the rest is that they weren&#8217;t Paige.  Tim Urban did a laughable rendition of Queen&#8217;s &#8220;Crazy Little Thing Called Love.&#8221;  If he was cleverly pandering to his base (the gay male vote), this was a brilliant song choice.  If he was just a clueless dope, this was terrible.  I thought he was going to stop in the middle to entreat the diners in the audience to &#8220;try the veal.&#8221;  As with Paige, I heard Ryan say that Aaron was going to sing Aerosmith, and immediately knew it was that cheesy song from &#8220;Armageddon.&#8221;  He wasn&#8217;t awful, but he sure as hell wasn&#8217;t good, despite Randy&#8217;s standard boy crush.  I loved the Ryan line, &#8220;If you want to vote for David Archuleta&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Andrew just keeps slipping.  He has the right voice for Marvin Gaye, but had a god-awful arrangement of &#8220;Heard It Through the Grapevine,&#8221; and sang it like a stalker.  I think he&#8217;s done very soon.  Katie Stephens finally pulled out a song written after she was born, singing Fergie&#8217;s &#8220;Big Girls Don&#8217;t Cry.&#8221;  I must admit that I did 90 seconds of web surfing during this performance and don&#8217;t really remember it.  Finally, Didi chose Carly Simon, which should have been in her wheelhouse, but then did a weird, cabaret version that looked like she was auditioning for an Andrew Lloyd Webber musical.  Not good, but again, after Paige, who&#8217;s worried?</p>
<p>Predictions for bottom three:  Paige (duh), Tim (again), and Andrew.  Bye Paige.</p>
<p>What did you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/03/idol-thoughts-wow-just-wow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOST: More Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/03/lost-more-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/03/lost-more-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As promised, here is a new set of intriguing questions from the previous list that remain unanswered going into the much anticipated Richard Alpert episode (more spoilers abound after the jump):</p>
<p></p>
<p>Does &#8220;The Incident&#8221; refer to the electromagnetic pocket being breached, or the hydrogen bomb being detonated?  Or both?</p>
<p>This goes deep into an issue I&#8217;ve been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As promised, here is a new set of intriguing questions from the previous list that remain unanswered going into the much anticipated Richard Alpert episode (more spoilers abound after the jump):</p>
<p><span id="more-255"></span></p>
<p><em>Does &#8220;The Incident&#8221; refer to the electromagnetic pocket being breached, or the hydrogen bomb being detonated?  Or both?</em></p>
<p>This goes deep into an issue I&#8217;ve been contemplating.  Are we supposed to assume that the two storylines this year are parallel timelines, created by some split in the past?  If so, was that split cause by one of these scenarios?</p>
<p><em>Charles Widmore knew of Paik Industries and even mentioned that he played golf regularly with Sun&#8217;s father.  Are these two powerful men merely business associates, or do they share a deeper connection (such as an interest in the island, perhaps)?</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s become fairly clear that the flash-sideways stories are beginning to interconnect in significant ways.  In the 815 crash timeline, Keamey worked for Widmore, and in the sideways timeline, Keamey had Jin locked in the back of the kitchen where Sayid killed him.  That points toward a Jin/Widmore relationship of some kind.</p>
<p><em>What did Jacob do to Richard to cause him to stop aging?</em></p>
<p>I think we might get an answer to this and other Richard Alpert questions tomorrow.  The answer may start to provide some insight into Jacob&#8217;s identity and the nature of his (and the Man in Black&#8217;s) power.</p>
<p>In some ways, these questions pale in comparison to new questions introduced this season (which, in some ways, makes me wonder how many of the old questions will go unanswered simply because we don&#8217;t care as much about them as new questions).  For instance, I&#8217;d add the following key questions:</p>
<p><em>Has Sayid finally given in to the dark side?</em></p>
<p><em>Who, if anyone, is going to replace Jacob?</em></p>
<p><em>Does Widmore&#8217;s appearance in the sub mean that now anyone can find the island?</em></p>
<p><em>When the Man in Black says he wants to get off the island, where/when does he want to go?</em></p>
<p><em>Will the timelines converge, or will one or the other be obliterated?  Or neither?</em></p>
<p>What are your big questions as we move toward the series finale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stuff-nonsense.com/2010/03/lost-more-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
